Kia Niro long-term test review: final report

Kia Niro long-term test review

Darren craved more driver appeal from it

Kia’s first dedicated hybrid model has left us with mixed feelings

On paper, the Kia Niro is a tempting proposition.

Here’s a crossover with space for the family and their luggage, but with the attractive running costs of a hybrid and low tax bills to match. It even squares up well on looks and Kia‘s seven-year warranty further sweetens the deal.

But on-paper appeal is different from real life, and over eight months and more than 6800 miles, we’ve found Kia’s first dedicated hybrid to be something of a mixed bag. And, as Frank Sinatra once sang, I’ve learned some things that only time can teach.

Where the Kia really found its footing was during my weekday commute, seven gnarly miles along a mix of tight urban streets and dual carriageways, with the top speed of 50mph on a clear run. Here, the Niro could use its electric power in stop-start traffic, minimising the fuel consumption. Or that’s the theory: in the real world, disappointingly, my average hovered around 45-46mpg.

Even when we drove as carefully as we could, we were unable to get close to Kia’s claimed fuel economy figure of 64.2mpg (combined). In fact, the best we saw was 51.9mpg.

We travelled far and wide in the Niro, too, from my home county of Northamptonshire to the Lake District and into mainland Europe. That gave us plenty of time to assess how it performed on motorways. There was sufficient performance from the 1.6-litre petrol engine to get you up to speed, but the car was far from quiet in terms of wind and road noise. When I used the cruise control, the Niro oscillated either side of the pre-set speed rather than holding a constant velocity.

There were things we liked, though. Executive editor Matt Burt was impressed by how the Niro handled country lanes, where at slower speeds the hybrid system could merrily flit between its petrol and electric power sources.

It’s also worth noting that the Niro’s interior, despite not offering the same quality you’d find in rivals such as the Volkswagen Tiguan, was comfortable. The seats were supportive, and when I filled the rear bench with friends, there weren’t any complaints about leg or head room. I was grateful for our car’s heated seats and heated steering wheel during the cold winter months, too.

The Niro was 90% of the way towards being a good car to live with, but it was the final 10% of the experience, which manifested itself in small niggles and issues, that would put me off buying this model. A bit more engagement in the everyday driving experience, a more linear throttle response, better quality inside and an increase in fuel economy, and this model could be more appealing.

I say ‘this model’, because I wouldn’t rule out the Niro entirely. Plug-in hybrid and pure-electric versions are on the way. As a plug-in hybrid, I reckon the Niro would be a far more accomplished car. It would be a crossover that could cover my short commute on electric power alone and still offer a good driving range for weekend trips. If you’ll allow me to return to Ol’ Blue Eyes, the best is (probably) yet to come. DM

LIKE IT: SPACE – Swallowed airport luggage and extra passengers with ease. GEARBOX – Six-speed auto is much better than the CVTs we’re used to in hybrids.

LOATHE IT: INTERIOR QUALITY – Cabin is comfortable but there are too many hard plastics on display. DRIVING EXPERIENCE – From dead steering to a non-linear throttle, there’s little engagement. FUEL ECONOMY – Despite our best efforts, the Niro isn’t as fuel efficient as it should be.


When faced with a week’s holiday with my parents in the rural Lake District, ideally I would have sought out a rugged diesel SUV rather than the Niro, which is described by its maker as an ‘urban crossover hybrid’.

In fact, the Niro was a qualified success on our trip. As I found with the Toyota Auris Hybrid I once ran, long motorway journeys at a constant cruising speed don’t really offer a chance for the electric motor to deploy so you end up lugging around heavy batteries that are largely redundant.

In the Lakes, though, the Niro was more proficient. I soon realised that, in some ways, Lakeland roads aren’t too dissimilar from urban areas: your average speed is fairly slow because space is tight and there’s plenty of braking, stopping and pulling away. Those factors play to the strengths of the Niro’s hybrid powertrain.

Then there are the steep hills,which offer opportunities for the regenerative braking system to recharge the battery on the declines but also highlight an absence of useful torque, at least when the Niro is in the default Eco driving mode. Given how we’re often told that a benefit of an electric motor is instant torque from zero revs, it’s disappointing there isn’t more low-end punch when it is needed most.

My brim-to-brim fuel calculations for our 424-mile week suggested the Niro returned 48.8mpg; not too bad, but not significantly more than a careful driver could expect to achieve from a standard diesel-engined car.


Price £24,695 Price as tested £25,240 Economy 45.6mpg Faults Battery drained Expenses None Mileage 4968


Okay, so a small hybrid crossover probably wasn’t the ideal car to scrounge for my week off.

Let me explain: I’d set myself the rather ambitious task of building a brick wall in my garden for a new greenhouse to sit on. The job involved carting many, many bags of sand and cement from a DIY store back to my gaff. Custodian Darren Moss kindly offered the Niro’s services and, well, it was that, a Morgan 3 Wheeler or a Renault Twizy. Easy decision.

Anyway, each bag weighed 25kg, so after some quick back-of-a-fag-packet calculations, I worked out that I could legally carry 13 bags at once. To put that in some sort of context, our <a target="_blank" …read more

Source:: Autocar